Davis voters reject Measure V, spiking plans to build Village Farms housing

The ballot measure to approve or reject the Village Farms housing development proved divisive ahead of the election.

Published on June 16, 2026

No on measure V signs in Davis on May 27, 2026. Photo by Denis Akbari.

"No on Measure V" signs in Davis on May 27, 2026.

Denis Akbari

The Abridged version:

  • Measure V, which would have authorized the Village Farms housing development, has been rejected by Davis voters.
  • With few ballots left to count, the narrow margin of “no” votes is poised to hold.
  • Rejection means the project cannot move forward and a new plan is needed to restart the approval process.

Measure V has failed at the hands of Davis voters, halting plans to build the Village Farms housing development.

With fewer than 400 ballots left to count in Yolo County, many of which likely are from outside of Davis, “no” leads by 238 votes. The county elections office will not certify the race until all ballots are counted.

“I won’t bet my house, I won’t bet even my bottle of shampoo on this,” said Sandy Whitcombe from the Yes on V campaign. “There’s really no way.”

Sign Up for the Yolo County Newsletter

Stay in-the-know on all things Yolo! Weekly email with stories and insights from Yolo County reporter Daniel Hennessy.

The last hope for the “yes” campaign is a recount, but Whitcombe said that is also unlikely.

She said the count would have to be within half of a percentage point, meaning the tally in favor would need to gain roughly 100 votes. Then, the Yes on V campaign would need to initiate the process.

“If we wanted to do a recount, we would have to pay for it,” she said.

Whitcombe said that Davis still needs the housing, but she doesn’t see the families behind Village Farms spearheading another project.

“We need a break,” she said. “We got so close.”

Davis voters were split on Measure V from the beginning, with supporters touting Village Farms’ potential to bolster the city’s housing stock and opponents raising concerns about the environment, traffic and the affordable housing plan.

Results show that more voters on the western side of Davis near the university supported the development, while those living in eastern neighborhoods were more likely to oppose it.

Daniel Hennessy joins Abridged from the California Local News Fellowship. He’s a reporter covering Yolo County. 

Latest Articles

Sacramento County greenlights controversial housing plan against city concerns

The Abridged version: The number of homes in the Natomas…

Read Article →

Where to find World Cup countries’ foods at Sacramento-area restaurants

The following is from City of Treats, a food and…

Read Article →

Sacramento County to decide on divisive plan adding thousands of homes near Natomas

The Abridged version: Thousands of homes may cover about 2,000…

Read Article →

Get Abridged in your inbox

Keep up with the latest

Get the inside scoop on local news, restaurants and entertainment with Abridged newsletters.

Secret Link